Do Meditation, Mindfulness, and Self-Compassion Impact Utilitarian Moral Judgment?

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Objectives Meditation practices, mindfulness, and self-compassion have been found to affect our physical mental well-being in many ways. However, can they also moral judgment, for example, what we think about right wrong? This study aims explore the potential influence of meditation, mindfulness on utilitarian judgments. Method In Study 1 ( n = 316), measured participants’ frequency their level self-compassion, judgment through two well-known dilemmas (switch bridge) using a two-dimensional model psychology (the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale with negative, i.e., instrumental harm, positive, impartial beneficence dimensions). 2 41), conducted psychological 8-week course same variables as before after course. Results 1, observed that participants who meditated more often exhibited lower levels harm. 2, had Conclusions Practices such meditation may be related specifically acceptance harming others (instrumental harm), but reduce concern welfare people possible (impartial beneficence). Further research is needed understand better if how judgments change when meditate develop self-compassion. Preregistration The studies were not pre-registered.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy.

Psychopathic behavior is characteristically amoral, but to date research studies have largely failed to identify any systematic differences in moral judgment capability between psychopaths and non-psychopaths. In this study, we investigate whether significant differences in moral judgment emerge when taking into account the phenotypic heterogeneity of the disorder through a well-validated disti...

متن کامل

For the greater goods? Ownership rights and utilitarian moral judgment.

People often judge it unacceptable to directly harm a person, even when this is necessary to produce an overall positive outcome, such as saving five other lives. We demonstrate that similar judgments arise when people consider damage to owned objects. In two experiments, participants considered dilemmas where saving five inanimate objects required destroying one. Participants judged this unacc...

متن کامل

For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment.

Though scholars have speculated for centuries on links between individuals' social class standing and approach to moral reasoning, little systematic research exists on how class and morality are associated. Here, we investigate whether the tendency of upper-class individuals to exhibit reduced empathy makes them more likely to resist intuitionist options in moral dilemmas, instead favoring util...

متن کامل

Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment

Is it permissible to harm one to save many? Classic moral dilemmas are often defined by the conflict between a putatively rational response to maximize aggregate welfare (i.e., the utilitarian judgment) and an emotional aversion to harm (i.e., the non-utilitarian judgment). Here, we address two questions. First, what specific aspect of emotional responding is relevant for these judgments? Secon...

متن کامل

Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment.

Traditional theories of moral development emphasize the role of controlled cognition in mature moral judgment, while a more recent trend emphasizes intuitive and emotional processes. Here we test a dual-process theory synthesizing these perspectives. More specifically, our theory associates utilitarian moral judgment (approving of harmful actions that maximize good consequences) with controlled...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Mindfulness

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1868-8527', '1868-8535']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02161-0